‘Snapshot’ of the country is a first in health reports

Talk about it

Where you live plays a role in your health, and a new report that ranks health factors in each of the nation’s 3,000-plus counties promises to point local policymakers to ways they can help.

Looking at each state’s best and worst further illuminates a well-known trend: The least healthy counties tend to be poor and rural, and the healthiest ones tend to be suburban and upper-income.

The report isn’t the first to examine county-level health. Cancer and access to health care, for example, have long been studied that way. But the new database ties standard measures – general health and the rate of premature death – with more factors that play a role in those outcomes, from smoking, obesity and binge drinking to the unemployment rate, childhood poverty, air pollution and access to grocery stores.

The report compares counties within a state, not from one state to another.

“This just paints a picture” of areas for improvement, said Dr. Patrick Remington of the University of Wisconsin, which started ranking its state’s counties in 2003 and co-authored the new 50-state report with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

These snapshots raise which-came-first questions. Does a poor community negatively influence its residents’ health? Or does it become unhealthy because it’s where high-risk populations – people who lack health care or are more likely to smoke, for example – can afford to move?

Both, says Remington. He pointed to Menominee County, ranked last in Wisconsin with 15 percent of its residents in poor or fair health and a high rate of premature death. It’s an Indian reservation, and the entire county has no grocery store to counter fast-food restaurants and convenience stores, he said.

“Without a grocery store, it’s hard to make a healthy choice about what you’re going to eat for lunch or dinner,” Remington said.

Overall, the report found least healthy counties have childhood poverty rates more than three times higher than the healthiest counties. Residents of the least healthy counties are 60 percent more likely to be hospitalized for preventable conditions, a sign of poor primary care. A third of zip codes in the least healthy counties have at least one grocery store, compared to almost half of zip codes in the healthiest counties.

“If we step back and ask ourselves what really influences health, it’s more than medical care,” said Dr. Elliott Fisher of the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy, a proponent of county-level health research.

Tradition in state

In Minnesota, the County Health Rankings are an additional tool that counties can use to examine their health, said Minnesota Commiss-ioner of Health Dr. Sanne Magnan. “The County Health Rankings help shine a light on the wide range of factors that influence health,” she said. “They provide one snapshot of the health of our communities and point out places where we’re doing well and places where we can improve.”

Local health departments in Minnesota already do extensive measurement of the health of their communities. Minnesota’s Local Public Health Act requires local health departments to conduct a comprehensive assessment and planning process every five years in order to identify public health challenges and strategies for improving health. “Our local health departments already do an excellent job measuring the health of their populations,” Magnan said. “This is one reason why Minnesota consistently ranks as one of the healthiest states in the nation.”

Tags: two harbors, silver bay, news, health